Saturday, December 6, 2008
Administaff - An Employee's Prospective
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Common Mistakes of Shopping for PEOs and Employee Leasing on the Web
By Bruce Silver, Founder
Employers Rx LLC
Third of a three part series.
What is Behind Door Number # 1, 2 or 3?
When searching the internet for a PEO, it is important for a busy executive to have some idea of what your needs are, and understand the process you are about to undertake, before starting on your virtual journey. We have identified three types of websites that Google and Yahoo link to when searching for employee leasing or professional employer organizations. The first type of website that visitors will encounter are “Provider” sites, next are “Leads” sites, and last but not least, websites of PEO “Brokers” or consultants.
Is your company among the thousands who are looking for affordable health insurance coverage? You probably have read that professional employer organizations can save business owners 20% to 30% on their health insurance premiums because of their large group health plan. While this claim may be slightly exaggerated, the fact is that less then 10% of all professional employer organizations actually have a master group health plan.
Door # 1 – Are You A PEO Provider?
So how do you know if the website you visit belongs to a true employee leasing or professional employer organization? Look for logos of national and local industry associations like NAPEO, ESAC, FAPEO and others. At the same time, logos from payroll or staffing associations may mean the company is not focused on providing comprehensive human resource services or the “Fortune 500” benefits plans you want.
The “About Us” section should identify the management, their background and expertise. Are you looking for a company that offers a true “master” group health plan? Click on the employee or benefits section to see what types of employee benefits programs are available. Don’t be fooled by insurance company logos. Linking to the websites of Aetna, Blue Cross, or any of the national or regional health plans networks, does not indicate that a company has a large group health plan to offer.
Many PEO’s claim to save you money because of their “large group purchasing power”. In reality, all you get is their insurance broker shopping the market. You may be better of with your own broker. It is important to read between the lines. Here are a few examples.
We offer customized, tailored benefits programs, suited to meet each of our clients’ needs, objectives, demands, and budget. We negotiate contract renewals or we handle receipt of carrier billing and payments.
Be prepared to ask tough questions when you contact the PEO or employee leasing company. Ask about renewals and underwriting. Remember that you will be speaking with someone who represents only that company, and it’s their job to “close the sale”.
Door # 2 – You’re Leading Me On?
Next stop on our virtual tour are the nefarious “Leads” websites. Many of these websites are very attractive, easy to navigate and usually feature information taken directly from websites of established companies (without their knowledge). A typical example is the website SmallBusinessExpo.com. Notice the last sentence at the bottom of the page.
Are you Gevity? Call to customize this page at no charge. Contact us by phone or email.
Google links to obvious “Leads” websites like BuyerZone.com and Staffmarket.com. It is relatively easy to see that these sites collect your company information and sell it to the highest bidders. Many “Leads” websites provide visitors pages of information on topics relevant to employee leasing such as payroll processing and workers compensation. Often the articles are written offshore or copied from legitimate HR blogs and websites.
Websites carrying ads from Google is another clear sign to move on. Why would any employee leasing, PEO or HR company want a competitor advertising on their website. Beware of companies who consistently rank first or second place in Google or Yahoo. In a recent search of Google for employee leasing, first position linked to wiseGeek.com. wiseGeek is owned and operated by Conjecture Corporation of Sparks, Nevada who “creates and manages a portfolio of informational and entertaining consumer web sites”.
Door # 3 – PEO Broker, Who’s Side Are You On?
Our last stop takes us to websites of “Brokers” or consultants specializing in employee leasing, HR outsourcing and the professional employer industry. You will find there are exceptional professionals across the country, many have years of industry experience, with backgrounds in accounting, banking, and insurance. But, how will you know if you have found a qualified consulting firm or PEO brokerage that will help you find and negotiate for a suitable provider? My best advice comes from President Ronald Reagan, who when dealing with the USSR on nuclear disarmament said; “trust but verify”.
“Brokers” websites typically offer business owners and executives a choice of leasing firms and PEOs to select from. Some consultants specialize in a particular region of the country, or have experience with certain industries. The demands and requirements of a client in the trucking business is not the same as an IT company. An industry professional will know exactly which PEOs to contact for a proposal. Ask the firm for their years in business, background, industry experience and expertise, and how they are compensated?
Website testimonials may indicate client satisfaction, but it is always a good idea to ask for, and follow-up on references from both their clients, and the companies they work with. LinkedIn members can access groups dedicated to the PEO industry where you can ask industry professionals about a particular broker or consultant’s reputation. Buyer beware is the rule of the day when shopping for payroll, HR outsourcing and professional employer services.
Tell us if we removed some of the bumps on your road to finding the right employee leasing company or professional employer organization for your business.
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Don't Take it by Heather Huhman
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Disappointed by your PEO or Employee Leasing Company?
Employers Rx LLC
Have you been disappointed by an employee leasing company or professional employer organization? Was your PEO hired to help you with your employee administration, benefits and compliance tasks. Let's face it. Most PEO's claim to be comprehensive HR organizations who help small business save time and money.
Sometimes this isn't always the case.
Blogger Jonathan Kamens on his blog entitled Something Better To Do describes his experience as an employee of Advent Software, a small software company specializing in financial management systems.
Administaff disappoints
A little less than a year ago, my employer, Tamale Software (since acquired by Advent Software, in what I would happily classify as the fourth successful acquisition of the five in which I’ve been involved), decided to outsource its human resources function to the Professional Employer Organization (PEO) Administaff.
Administaff uses a “co-employment” model, wherein the employees of Administaff’s clients become employees of Administaff as well, and Administaff handles health insurance, payroll, recruiting, performance management, etc. Administaff clients don’t necessarily use all of Administaff’s services; it’s a menu from which they choose what they want. The biggest reason for a company to use Administaff is probably to reduce the cost of health insurance. Administaff can bargain with the insurance industry for lower rates than a small or medium-sized business can on its own, since they have a far larger employee pool.
Tamale has always had awesome benefits, including great health insurance with 100% of the premiums paid by the company. But the company and its employees got a little older and more mature (read “got married and/or started having babies;” I must confess that I’m a major contributor to this!), and at the same time the cost of health insurance skyrocketed across the board. It’s therefore not surprising that Tamale went looking for a way to reduce its costs, and perhaps switching to Administaff was a necessary evil.
Nonetheless, from the point of view of the employees, it was not a positive change. We went from having all of our HR needs seen to directly by an extremely competent, friendly Tamale employee in our office, to dealing over the phone or internet with nameless, faceless Administaff employees cut out of the “barely adequate customer service representative” mold.
Of course, the Administaff sales people sang the praises of their service team and spoke glowingly about how painless the transition would be. I’m sure it will come as no surprise that the reality did not live up to the hype. There were problems from the start, and the problems continued throughout our time with Administaff. A few examples:
- When we filled out the HMO enrolment paperwork, we were given the option of specifying primary care physicians (PCPs) on the forms and told that they would be entered into the system with our initial enrolment. Many of us took the time to look up PCP ID numbers and include them on the form. Administaff did not bother to enter anyone’s PCPs into the system.
- When our HR manager contacted Administaff about the fact that they had completely ignored everyone’s PCP designations, rather than immediately admitting the error and agreeing to rectify it, they told her that we would all have to call the insurance company directly to take care of it. Needless to say, she pushed back until they agreed to solve the problem.
- With their commuter pass program, it was impossible to know from one month to the next which paycheck the cost of the pass would be deducted from. Some months it was the first paycheck, some months it was the second, and some months they completely forgot and had to deduct from both paychecks in the following month.
- They charge a $2 fee per month for the commuter pass program. No employer I have ever worked for in my entire life has charged a fee for participating in a commuter program.
- One month they simply failed to process the commuter passes on time, and we didn’t get them until after the beginning of the next month. We received a letter notifying us that our passes were going to be late and instructing us to buy “day passes” for the intervening days (what about people who live out in yachupitzville where nobody sells T passes?) and then to send in a form to be reimbursed for them. Wow, what a great time-saver!
- It sometimes took Administaff as long as a week and a half to deposit 401k money withheld from paychecks into people’s 401k accounts. Yes, that means that Administaff was making money off of the float in the interim.
- When we terminated our relationship with Administaff after the acquisition, I applied to have my Health-care Flexible Spending Account (FSA) continue under COBRA, because there was a lot of money remaining in the account and I needed more time to spend it. Two weeks after sending the premium check to Administaff to continue the FSA coverage, the check still hadn’t been cashed and the FSA provider still had my account marked closed and therefore was refusing to accept new claims.
Everybody makes mistakes, and occasional mistakes can and should be forgiven. But when there’s a pattern of mistakes, as in the odd-numbered items above, that a sign not only of a lack of quality, but of not caring about quality. And as for the even-numbered items above, they represent much more than simple mistakes; they represent conscious decisions that are detrimental to the customer.
I did a little research about Administaff and discovered that in addition to the “little” problems (not so little, really!) described above, they’ve had their share of Big Problems as well:
- In October 2007, an Administaff laptop containing unecrypted personal data on 159,000 current and former employees managed by Administaff was stolen. Adam Breindel has a great takeon just what this incident says about Administaff (and it isn’t good).
- Back in 2003, Administaff attempted to intimidate people out of saying negative things on their Yahoo! Finance message board by suing Yahoo! and demanding that they reveal the identities of the people making the comments. More information at The Center for Internet and Society at Stanford.
I understand that small and medium-sized businesses face incredible pressure to lower costs any way they can, and for some of them, going with a PEO like Administaff might be inevitable. But I urge any business considering such a move to evaluate carefully the impact on employee morale and the time employees will waste dealing problems like the ones described above, and I urge such businesses to evaluate not merely cost, but also quality of service when choosing which PEO to utilize.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Common Mistakes Made Shopping for PEOs and Employee Leasing on the Web
Unfortunately, Google and Yahoo often list the NAPEO website on the second page. Usually people will click on the first few "paid" inclusions found at the top and side of the search page. These ads are sold to the highest bidder and it may indicate an organization that is more interested in putting their money into marketing, instead of delivering affordable quality service.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Common Mistakes Made Shopping for PEOs and Employee Leasing on the Web
Friday, October 24, 2008
7 Signs That Your Company May Be Ready for HR Outsourcing
By Bruce Silver
HR World continues to be a valuable source of "Real World" information for busy executives, business owners and HR managers. John Edwards points out the signals that successful enterprises, large and small, should pay attention to.
We know that many readers of this blog operate small and mid-sized companies who do not have HR departments. That doesn't mean that your HR functions aren't being performed. Unfortunately, many firms lack employees well "versed" in employment rules and regulations.
John's article takes you on an enlightening tour from the boardroom to the mailroom . When will you know it's time to consider outsourcing your organization's HR administration and compliance functions? See how HR practices can effect the success of your business.
By John Edwards

There comes a time in the life of most successful businesses when a decision has to be made as to whether certain HR tasks are best handled in-house or by an HRO (human resources outsourcer). Making the right call at the right time isn't easy, but certain telltale signs can indicate when it's time to "pull the trigger" and call for help. This is what you should look for:
Spiraling Costs: Rapidly rising costs in payroll, benefit management and other key areas continue to be the primary driver for HR outsourcing. While cost reduction isn't the only reason for using an HRO — efficiency, quality and speed are other motivating factors — it's certainly a major consideration.
Missed Deadlines: If a growing number of employees are complaining that critical documents, ranging from paychecks to W-2 forms, are arriving late, it's a sign that something is broken. There's a good chance that the delays are being caused by an HR department that's stretched beyond its capabilities. An HRO can step in and help get critical work back on schedule without the need to hire new HR employees or upgrade facilities.
System Overloads: If HR tasks are beginning to overwhelm internal IT resources, it’s time to either invest in additional technology or turn at least some of the crippling workload over to a third party. HROs rely on their own IT systems, enabling in-house systems to focus on non-HR-related tasks. A cost/benefit analysis may show that it would be cheaper for your business to shift data-intensive and high-priority HR resources, such as employee databases and Web self-service operation, to an HRO rather than invest in new on-site technology.
Increasing Mistakes: No HR department is foolproof, but snowballing goofs are another sure sign that people and systems are being stretched beyond their limits. Assigning mistake-prone work to an HRO can lower the pressure on in-house staffers. The best part is that an HRO can be held accountable for supplying a basic level of accuracy in whatever work it handles. This is especially important in situations such as payroll where legal compliance is an issue.
Poor Quality Work: Mediocre or worse output over an extended period of time is a sign that an HR department is being overworked or — more ominously — simply isn't competent. While a business may wish to experiment with new managers and work procedures, it may be simpler to just outsource everything to a third party, either permanently or while a new HR department is being assembled.
Disgruntled HR Workers: Employee griping is as common as office football pools. But when the complaining begins drowning out normal discourse, it's time to start considering remedial action. An HRO can step in during busy seasons to take on the extra time-consuming tasks that drive up HR workloads and staff discontentment.
Competitors' Moves: Are many of your business' prime competitors shifting to HROs? If so, they might have spotted a need that you may not have yet detected or have been unwilling to acknowledge. Ask around and find out what benefits your rivals are gaining from outsourcing HR work. You may discover that these same issues apply to your organization.